<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Tutorial on How to Install PHP-Nuke!</title> <atom:link href="http://www.evohosting.co.uk/blog/web-development/php-nuke/tutorial-on-how-to-install-php-nuke/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.evohosting.co.uk/blog/web-development/php-nuke/tutorial-on-how-to-install-php-nuke/</link> <description>UK Web Hosting</description> <lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 11:57:29 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency><meta
name="generator" content="Obscure 2.0" /> <item><title>By: Cat M.</title><link>http://www.evohosting.co.uk/blog/web-development/php-nuke/tutorial-on-how-to-install-php-nuke/comment-page-1/#comment-4627</link> <dc:creator>Cat M.</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2009 09:16:51 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.evohosting.co.uk/blog/?p=764#comment-4627</guid> <description>I agree that Joomla offers more features than PHP Nuke, but a lot of people find PHP Nuke easier to use; they&#039;re okay with having fewer features if it means it&#039;s easier for them to set up and run a site (a friend of mine created a site with PHP Nuke for that exact reason).  I don&#039;t find Joomla to be that difficult to use, but I figure not everyone feels the same way.
As far as themes for PHP Nuke go, I also agree that they tend to be a little on the plain side when compared to Joomla templates.  However, everyone has different tastes, and some people prefer to have very simple and basic themes. I don&#039;t have a favorite theme for PHP Nuke, but you can find free themes at &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.themesbase.com/?category=PHPNuke&quot;&gt;Themes Base&lt;/a&gt;</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree that Joomla offers more features than PHP Nuke, but a lot of people find PHP Nuke easier to use; they&#8217;re okay with having fewer features if it means it&#8217;s easier for them to set up and run a site (a friend of mine created a site with PHP Nuke for that exact reason).  I don&#8217;t find Joomla to be that difficult to use, but I figure not everyone feels the same way.</p><p>As far as themes for PHP Nuke go, I also agree that they tend to be a little on the plain side when compared to Joomla templates.  However, everyone has different tastes, and some people prefer to have very simple and basic themes. I don&#8217;t have a favorite theme for PHP Nuke, but you can find free themes at <a
href="http://www.themesbase.com/?category=PHPNuke">Themes Base</a></p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Geek Blogger</title><link>http://www.evohosting.co.uk/blog/web-development/php-nuke/tutorial-on-how-to-install-php-nuke/comment-page-1/#comment-4614</link> <dc:creator>Geek Blogger</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2009 21:10:44 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.evohosting.co.uk/blog/?p=764#comment-4614</guid> <description>Php Nuke is good but doesnt joomla / mambo have better features ?
Also its not very visually stimulating whats the best theme&#039;s for it ?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Php Nuke is good but doesnt joomla / mambo have better features ?</p><p>Also its not very visually stimulating whats the best theme&#8217;s for it ?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
